 |
Contact |
Post your comments here:
Page
1 |
2 |
Jeanie, Calgary Alberta
Posted: May 17, 2010 | 03:05 AM
"I believe in immigration; no I do not believe it should be as open as it is." from Enid - Eastend, Skatch, reflected my sentiments on the polls. Other than that, I really enjoy all the content and thank you!
Posted: May 17, 2010 | 03:05 AM
"I believe in immigration; no I do not believe it should be as open as it is." from Enid - Eastend, Skatch, reflected my sentiments on the polls. Other than that, I really enjoy all the content and thank you!
Enid, EASTEND Saskatchewan
Posted: Apr 26, 2010 | 03:36 AM
This is my first visit to your site. I very much like and believe in polls, certainly yours included! My one comment: some can not be answered with a yes, or a no. Can you give a third option? for example, yes I believe in immigration; no I do not believe it should be as open as it is.
Posted: Apr 26, 2010 | 03:36 AM
This is my first visit to your site. I very much like and believe in polls, certainly yours included! My one comment: some can not be answered with a yes, or a no. Can you give a third option? for example, yes I believe in immigration; no I do not believe it should be as open as it is.
Nicole, Alberta
Posted: Feb 4, 2010 | 09:38 AM
Howdy,
Nicole here, love you show! I upload it to Facebook for all my fellow Albertans to see as well. If you could, could you please interview Jim Hnatiuk, the party leader of the CHP. I tend to align myself with the CHP although since Airdrie doesn't have a CHP representitive and I feel I'm too young and inexperienced to run myself, I'd vote Libertarian. Anyways, I'd greatly appreciate you interviewing the 6th largest party in Canada .
Thank you and God Bless,
Nicole
Posted: Feb 4, 2010 | 09:38 AM
Howdy,
Nicole here, love you show! I upload it to Facebook for all my fellow Albertans to see as well. If you could, could you please interview Jim Hnatiuk, the party leader of the CHP. I tend to align myself with the CHP although since Airdrie doesn't have a CHP representitive and I feel I'm too young and inexperienced to run myself, I'd vote Libertarian. Anyways, I'd greatly appreciate you interviewing the 6th largest party in Canada .
Thank you and God Bless,
Nicole
rick, kelowna British Columbia
Posted: Jan 4, 2010 | 03:22 PM
Great site. Finaly someone who knows what they are talking about. Definition of politics and by Association the politician. Poli meaning tiny or small, tics being blood sucking parasites.
Posted: Jan 4, 2010 | 03:22 PM
Great site. Finaly someone who knows what they are talking about. Definition of politics and by Association the politician. Poli meaning tiny or small, tics being blood sucking parasites.
Christopher, Edmonton Alberta
Posted: Jul 6, 2009 | 04:47 AM
Hello!
I really enjoy this site and the content you've put together! I first came across this site from watching your videos on Youtube which directed me here to watch even more!
It saddens me that in such a great country like Canada we're not allowed to defend ourselves with anything. Anything can be considered a weapon, even a pen. However, if the time ever came I would be more than willing to go to jail to protect myself or loved ones.
Another thing that bothers me with our lack of free rights is that the police can now search your car without any warrants, this is related to that story about armored cars in Edmonton. There reason in doing so is to check if your vehicle is safe; Of course while trying to find something illegal in the process. This doesn't only apply to gang members, we can also be stopped and checked. I've had several occasions going out with the family and being stopped by police to check our documents out of random.
Once your rights are gone they're harder to get back, and those clowns in government and uneducated people out there don't make it any easier.
Keep up the great work on the site!
Posted: Jul 6, 2009 | 04:47 AM
Hello!
I really enjoy this site and the content you've put together! I first came across this site from watching your videos on Youtube which directed me here to watch even more!
It saddens me that in such a great country like Canada we're not allowed to defend ourselves with anything. Anything can be considered a weapon, even a pen. However, if the time ever came I would be more than willing to go to jail to protect myself or loved ones.
Another thing that bothers me with our lack of free rights is that the police can now search your car without any warrants, this is related to that story about armored cars in Edmonton. There reason in doing so is to check if your vehicle is safe; Of course while trying to find something illegal in the process. This doesn't only apply to gang members, we can also be stopped and checked. I've had several occasions going out with the family and being stopped by police to check our documents out of random.
Once your rights are gone they're harder to get back, and those clowns in government and uneducated people out there don't make it any easier.
Keep up the great work on the site!
Will, Cowberg Alberta
Posted: Apr 23, 2009 | 07:04 AM
To Nelson:
What you seem to be describing here is not so much "corporatism" as monopoly or oligopoly. Both thrive in collectivist statism with the government as a partner in the plunder/destruction of free markets. This state of economic affairs leads to command economy where a public/private sector crony oligopoly takes the role of central planning cabal.
Canada's Keynesian collectivists, in both legacy federal parties, have run and instilled a crony oligopolist system of varying degrees under the fallacious label of "mixed economy" and Keynesian central planning/regulating. Canada has NEVER seen nor enjoyed pure capitalism nor a laissez faire free market...we went from a Crown colony exploited by a chartered cabal of profiteering gentry under defacto economic feudalism to a quasi-imperial oligopoly after 1931 to a crony kleptocracy after 1982.
I’d like to offer you a more precise and demonstrable definition of "corporatism" :
Corporatism is a political culture in which adherents believe that the basic unit of society is some corporate group,(either public or private) rather than the individual. Political cultures which hold the individual as the basic unit are called democratic commonwealth republic.
What we have in Canada, and the US to a large degree, is an economic/political culture that holds the will of the electorate to be subordinate to the agendas and interests of an economic-political oligarchy. As such our markets are over regulated and limited to private individuals unless they pay fiscal and political tribute to an oligarchy member. Sponsorship by a political-economic oligopoly patron is essential to access the larger markets not available to unconnected market players.
Posted: Apr 23, 2009 | 07:04 AM
To Nelson:
What you seem to be describing here is not so much "corporatism" as monopoly or oligopoly. Both thrive in collectivist statism with the government as a partner in the plunder/destruction of free markets. This state of economic affairs leads to command economy where a public/private sector crony oligopoly takes the role of central planning cabal.
Canada's Keynesian collectivists, in both legacy federal parties, have run and instilled a crony oligopolist system of varying degrees under the fallacious label of "mixed economy" and Keynesian central planning/regulating. Canada has NEVER seen nor enjoyed pure capitalism nor a laissez faire free market...we went from a Crown colony exploited by a chartered cabal of profiteering gentry under defacto economic feudalism to a quasi-imperial oligopoly after 1931 to a crony kleptocracy after 1982.
I’d like to offer you a more precise and demonstrable definition of "corporatism" :
Corporatism is a political culture in which adherents believe that the basic unit of society is some corporate group,(either public or private) rather than the individual. Political cultures which hold the individual as the basic unit are called democratic commonwealth republic.
What we have in Canada, and the US to a large degree, is an economic/political culture that holds the will of the electorate to be subordinate to the agendas and interests of an economic-political oligarchy. As such our markets are over regulated and limited to private individuals unless they pay fiscal and political tribute to an oligarchy member. Sponsorship by a political-economic oligopoly patron is essential to access the larger markets not available to unconnected market players.
Page
1 |
2 |
